8th Organizational Storytelling
Seminar
Doctoral Workshop
Friday 5th May 2006
University of Southampton
Seminar Report
Aims and Objectives
This seminar was the eighth
in an informal series of seminars for academics and
practitioners engaged in, or researching about,
organisational storytelling.
This seminar was intended principally for doctoral
students, researchers and practitioners who are at an
early stage of their research careers, and practitioners
about to embark on using narrative methods within their
organisations. It took the form of a Panel Session, in
which experienced researchers discussed (and disagreed
about!) aspects of storytelling research. An important
objective was to link researchers into informal networks
with other researchers, and to provide a forum for debate
about practical and theoretical issues.
Attendees
There were 23 registrations, from seven
universities and two non-academic institutions (including
one from Holland). There were five panel members; Andrew
Brown (University of Bath), Con Connell (University of
Southampton), Yiannis Gabriel (Royal Holloway, University
of London), Jonathan Klein (University of Southampton)
and David Sims (City University).
Structure of the Seminar
The seminar took the
form of a Panel Session, structured around the following
themes:-
- Giving “research legitimacy” to the storytelling
approach. How stories feature in the life of
organizations, including those dominated by audits
and statistics, and how even audits and statistics
turn into narratives.
- Marrying-up the “individual” narrative to the
“organisational” narratives
- Different methods of using stories in
organizational research, including their collection
and “analysis”, together with reflections of key
issues such as trust and ethics, authenticity and
validity.
Much of the day was focussed around small-group
sessions. Students had been invited to undertake some
preparatory work prior to attending the seminar, and this
was discussed in the context of the day’s themes. The day
ended with the panel attempting to reach some consensus
during a question-and-answer session.
Learning outcomes
Delegates were given feedback
forms to complete. The feedback received from the event
was overwhelming positive, including the following
observations:-
“… such an inspiring and successful event.”
“… really good day….”
“… left me with lots of new ideas and
inspirations…”
“The conference was excellent.”
“… the organisation was great…”
“… a great learning event which I have very much
appreciated…interesting and innovative.”
“… certainly the best seminar I have been to……”
“… thought-provoking and inspiring
discussions….”
“… extremely helpful panel….”
“… Chance to discuss with others, especially
informally….”
Delegates were also invited to give ideas
about what they would like to see changed for future
similar events:-
“… more time, more structure in group
discussion.”
“… more documentation, especially on the website,
about speaker profiles and publications.”
“… more worked examples of how the methodology:-
a) translates into questions ‘in the field’;
b) is analysed for meaningful outcomes”.
Future Events
All delegates were added to the
mailing lists for future ESRC Seminars in this series.
Photos
Click on the thumbnail image to see the full sized
version of each picture: